Dean Tucker’s 11 propositions on engineering education
Sunday, April 26, 2009
On 17 April 2009, Dean Charles L. Tucker III made a presentation in Agricultural and Biological Engineering at UIUC in which he handed out and discussed a document entitled “Propositions on Engineering Undergraduate Education.” The content of that handout is republished here with Dean Tucker’s permission:
Here are some ideas about engineering education that I believe – at least for today. I offer them to you as prompts, to elicit your thoughts and enliven our conversation.
- Many of the skills and habits that we want our students to exhibit are not now taught explicitly – but they could be.
- Engineering curricula are difficult to change, but faculty are free to make changes both large and small.
- Our curricula are based on building knowledge progressively from the bottom up, and the way we teach every day acknowledges that this doesn’t work.
- The most important thing to learn as teachers is that our students are not us.
- Students have many useful things to say about what engineering education should be.
- The way we use grades, especially at the college level, is a prime example of “looking under the light.”
- The “pipeline” metaphor for student development and retention is worn out, and due for a change.
- It will never be possible to cover all of the technical facts and skills that our graduates “have to know,” and only a fraction of what we cover is actually retained.
- ABET is as useful to us as a required course is useful to our students.
- Signs that we are doing education very well include engagement, passion, and challenge – from students and faculty.
- Ultimately it’s what happens between a teacher and a student that matters.
Send your comments to Dean Tucker here.

